End of Enterprise-D

The Next Generation
Les
Petty officer third class
Petty officer third class
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:33 am

Post by Les »

I seem to recall in 'Yesterday's Enterprise the E-D destroying a K'vort class Bird of Prey with phaser-fire only, I may be mistaken but isn't the K'vort class a more powerful and capable series of Bird of Prey ships than the B'rels?

Still, sucked to see the closest thing the Federation had to a Battleship go-down to the 24th century equivilent to a Torpedo-Boat... but it still served a purpose. In addition to whatever narrative the movies tell, they also served to spotlight things featured in/alluded to in the Starfleet Technical Manual that never made it into the series... like the Saucer-Section's ability to make an emergency landing on a planet (Generations), or the 'Captain's Yacht' slung underneath the saucer-section (Insurrection).

Speaking of Insurrection and the E-E's rather lack-luster performance against the Son'a ships... My theory is that at the time, what with the Dominion War over and the Borg Queen dead (Hey, they didn't Know she'd left back-ups of herself in the Delta Quadrant) there seemed less of a need for full-on warships so the Enterprise-E was re-fitted for primarily diplomatic work (soothing any jittery neighbors worrying about a militarized Starfleet on their doorsteps for example) and had lost much of it's capacity as a warship. Seeing the pride of the fleet being schooled by what essentially amounted to a couple of 'Pirate' ships but for some quick-thinking and 'creative tactics' on Riker's part probably had some small part in the decision to massively up-gun the Soverigns and the Enterprise in particular.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

People rag on how it fought in that movie but it didn't do that badly. It was fighting weapons of mass distruction that no ship could of survived. It wasn't equipped to be in that area of space and was thus at a loss.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Good point.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
SolkaTruesilver
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:49 am

Post by SolkaTruesilver »

If I had been the Duras Sister, I would have targetted the Enterprise's Phaser array.

If you are going to get a surprise attack, target the weapons first, the engines laters. Maybe the Enterprise fired 1 torpedoe because it was the only tube left?

And.. we do know that the Romulan had at least some sort of attack ship in the sorrounding, seeing how they rampaged the Armagosa Station. Would have been nice seeing a romulan Warbird decloak, destroying the BoP in one volley, and helping the E-D land safely on Veridian...

ah....

hey. Have we EVER seen a Warbird showing what she had in her gut?
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

I think it would be pretty hard to knock out the Enterprises phasers. They cover such a large area.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

SolkaTruesilver wrote:And.. we do know that the Romulan had at least some sort of attack ship in the sorrounding, seeing how they rampaged the Armagosa Station.
I read once that the idea was that the E-D would have a battle with a Warbird at Amargosa and force it to retreat; that's why Soran says later that if it hadn't been for the Enterprise intervening the Romulans would have found the trilithium - when in the finished movie Picard and co just sort of wandered in afterwards.

They couldn't afford the FX for the battle, unfortunately.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Crushproof
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Crushproof »

Well if they spent it on that we might not have had the amazing Saucer crash, or the Stellar Cartography room.
"It is the way of all Empires, old Comrade, to fall prey to the next" ~Mirror Chekov
Image
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I think it would be pretty hard to knock out the Enterprises phasers. They cover such a large area.
We've seen the E-D's phasers go down plenty of times IIRC.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

One of the thoughts I had during that battle came right near the end when B'Etor yells "Target their bridge!" I just thought to myself "Oh, NOW you get around to that? I would have done it with my first shot. No, my first FIVE shots. And with the entire bridge crew dead, the E-D would not have been able to run, fight back, or come up with tricky things to do to your cloaking device for a good five minutes or so.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
SolkaTruesilver
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:49 am

Post by SolkaTruesilver »

GrahamKennedy wrote:One of the thoughts I had during that battle came right near the end when B'Etor yells "Target their bridge!" I just thought to myself "Oh, NOW you get around to that? I would have done it with my first shot. No, my first FIVE shots. And with the entire bridge crew dead, the E-D would not have been able to run, fight back, or come up with tricky things to do to your cloaking device for a good five minutes or so.
Well.. the silly thing is, what use is her periscope if she can't target herself?

Isn't the point of the periscope thing? So the Captain can fire himself, and have the glory of the kill?
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

SolkaTruesilver wrote:Isn't the point of the periscope thing? So the Captain can fire himself, and have the glory of the kill?
Well I did wonder that, but I figured she was yelling at the helmsman to get the ship into a position where she could bring weapons to bear.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Maybe that is considered dishonerable. They onylresort to attacking the bridge if they have no other option.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Crushproof
Ensign
Ensign
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Crushproof »

Frankly the bridge placement on every Federation ship is stupid. But it's there because it's Gene Roddenberry's 4th design rule: "The bridge must be situated on the top centre of the saucer section"
"It is the way of all Empires, old Comrade, to fall prey to the next" ~Mirror Chekov
Image
User avatar
I Am Spartacus
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada

Post by I Am Spartacus »

Crushproof wrote:Frankly the bridge placement on every Federation ship is stupid. But it's there because it's Gene Roddenberry's 4th design rule: "The bridge must be situated on the top centre of the saucer section"
Agreed, all an enemy has to do is get your shields down and with one shot he's won. You could say that sufficiently large ships have endlessly redundant backup systems, but placing the senior officers at such a great risk makes no sense.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Maybe there is a reason they are always there. I mean almost every species follows that rule so maybe there is some universe truth to putting a bridge there. If not everyone does it anyway so everyone has the same weakness.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Post Reply