Not sure if a third person is going to post so I'll go ahead:
Reliant121 wrote:
Munroe, the point of this thread is to see if a stalemate is possible. Your plan produces a minimal chance of winning a war, but there is no way that the generals of the EF will use it. it's simply to expensive in general to be viable, with such a small window of success. The EF, the Centauri, the Narn all the other races, know Nothing of the Minbari at this point. The Centauri who know the most, know only the border. How can you fight a war agaisnt an enemy you dont know the location of? Space is vast, you cant simply depth charge the entirety of it. It would be like firing depth charges into the sea from the start of a naval war. The chance your going to hit something is infitesimally small.
Yeah you might be right. While is does grant a chance of victory it might not be cost effective. I guess we'd have to see how much jump drives, engines, and a launch platform costs. I'll back off from the drone plan, though I still think it would be a good way to deliver multiple payloads to a technologically advanced planet as I'll explain further down.
Risk wise you're probably right its just not a good enough pay off.
Deepcrush wrote:OMG, I've seen whores on the street
I'm sure you have.
Well, if you need to beg for help yet again... call them in here.
As I recall I only asked them to have you watch your mouth. It was several pages later that you began complaining in that thread and others as more and more people called you crazy that they locked it. And they only locked it after you gave them the okay to do so. I never gave them the okay (not that they needed it). So because I asked mods to make you stay on subject it suddenly means I went crawling to them. Whereas when you posted in multiple threads about the uselessness of debating and asking for a lock you're not crawling for them? And then when I called you out on that last time you said I lied even though I could quote the entire post you made and provide a link to it?
Have them say in the open where and why I'm wrong.
I'm not going to mention the mod who told me in confidence how all the other mods thought I tore apart your message. If they would like to jump in here, or another mod, then they can feel free to but I'm not going to call them by name publicly.
I'm sure you have plenty of little excuses of spins on how things are going. I'm sure you've tried to pretend that by not answering or flat out ignoring statements made by me makes them go away.
Well I did try putting you on ignore you and it only made you jump around like a little child waving your hands. Ever since then I have never intentionally ignored anything you've said. What occured last time was you constantly saying I was wrong for no reason. Ignoring the evidence I posted. And never posting any evidence yourself. If I don't quote every thing you say then that is probably because I already addressed it and you're just repeating yourself or you're acting like such a tool then it doesn't need me to step in. But if you disagree with me that you want to be publically humilated more by your idiocy then repeat something you said that I skipped over and I'll address it.
Wrong again. My plan, as stated several times over, not that you'd ever bother to read before you speak. Is to fight a defensive campaign against the Minbari. Had this have happened, the outer colonies would have been left alone. The inner colonies would have been covered in Sol, and the Religious and Worker Castes would have succeeded in starting up peace talks without outside interference. Had the peace talk been run inside of Minbari or Sol space then the Centauri attack never would have happened. The Warrior caste would have been isolated and then, when the next cycle came around (I think its every 1.2 earth years, no promises) then the other two thirds of the Grey Council could have voted to end the war. Earth would admit defeat, the Warrior caste would claim a victory, and everyone walks away ALIVE. That being the most important part.
Okay so at the beginning of the war the EA knew that if they could just last a little bit longer the two castes of an alien species they never had contact with would vote against the war allowing the EA to surrender (which would mean a failure for the OP question) I think I got a fair grasp at your plan. And I do like the idea of reinforcing defenses. I have nothing against your basic approach. I just think it needs an offensive capability.
Anyone here who has served in the armed forces will tell you there are many books used in the instruction of war. All of which are based on how to... drum roll please.... how to kill the enemy in the most effective way possible. Sun Tzu's primary point of war is "Defeat the enemies will, not their army". This is the guy who truly wrote a Rule Book of War... And guess what... Its not pretend or make believe! What a wonder about that.
To paraphrase someone in the news recently having a conversation with you is like arguing with the dinning table. There are many books of war yeah... that's why there's no
one book on war that everyone agrees on. And besides, I love how you make the stab by saying I wasn't ever in the military when pointing to week four of basic when anyone who went to basic knows that that was rifle safety. Once again if you're going to attack my military record, which apparently has such a impact on this topic, stop looking like a complete idiot when you do so.
Oh, I do listen, and I even played it for a while. I know what it is, I know what its about or the basics at least. But I'm not familiar with the gaming aspects of it. She's also my Ex g/f now. Was this really the best insult you could throw? A "you don't listen" joke?
No, that was an honest apology. Stop being so defensive. I made an honest mistake and apologized.
Wrong. Its not OOU knowledge. They knew there were peace talks going on because they were there. They knew that many in the Minbari command wanted the war to end because the Minbari told them so. The EF knows the effect of mines on the Minbari ships. They know they can't beat the Minbari in a stand up fight. So, don't go out looking for the enemy. Make them come to you. Try to think of the point of a Defensive War. Its to drain your enemy, not to defeat them in battle, but to make them feel that the forced victory isn't worth the cost when the other side is willing to bow down and say "You win" without anymore cost.
I mentioned this above. I didn't know that the EA was familiar with the politics of the new alien on the block which just opened fire on them.
Normally I just hit people as stupid as you. Since that hasn't happened and I haven't offered too...
Hey if you're ever in town let me know.
You don't see them making it home with the very information that your whole plan rides on as important??? And yet you wonder why you're a joke to me.
Not when they are drones...
And you wonder why you're an idiot to everyone.
A, prove [we have drones]. B, prove that those drones can run a ship. C, prove that those drones can engage the Minbari since they don't have eyes.
A)
http://smart-machines.blogspot.com/2008 ... rfare.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous ... per_System
- And all you have to do is look at a modern game or simulator to see how computer programs can fly themselves.
B) Because of the basic components that will be needed for this ship. You only really need a navigational computer, a launching system, and a detonation system.
AI in B5?
http://babylon5.wikia.com/wiki/Sparky_the_Computer - Check.
Okay so they can make a grouchy AI, doesn't mean they can have it pilot a ship. That's something that was forgotten in the early 21st century you say.
http://babylon5.wikia.com/wiki/Special: ... pilot&go=1
Three examples of ships returning on autopilot, 2 of them EA.
But still. No way on Earth, you say, that a drone ship could deploy swarms of suicide craft quickly
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_i ... ry_vehicle
Basically the big drone ship arrives and deploys. Thousands of smaller atomic sized atomic weapons would strike the planet. Because of the Minbari capital ship lack of coverage and no AoE many would make it through. Simple law of numbers.
While I think this plan would work perfectly on known targets Reliant is right, it might not be cost effective enough to try in the Minbari war. So I'll back off from it. Though I do think it would be a great way to win wars against a known enemy.
You didn't solve anything. You pointed something out that has already been shown to be worthless by those very people you say PM you how much they support you.
I'll get to the targeting thing further on down. But since when is Lazar a moderator? If you're going to jump on every minor victory at least do so in a way that makes an ounce of sense.
Then prove that the EA in the E-M War has the ability to find it. Then prove they have the ability to hit it. Then show why the Minbari wouldn't just bypass the EF lines and glass Earth in response. Good luck.
1) Proving the EA in the E-M War can find Minbari space. Well this little tidbit is the most troubling as I've been saying from the beginning. -- Which is why I have changed my mind. But we do know where their midway bases and some of their planets are as my previous post said. You nuke those to death and they're not going to get supplies in. So playing a defensive war is even better. And if you destroy logistical HQs you aren't pissing off the other two castes. Finding the population centers I can't prove the EA could do it just like you can't prove they can't. There's too much unknown. But we do know the EA can find some Minbari controlled worlds.
2) Proving the EA has the ability to hit a planet. Well.. we know they have autopilot. We know they have AI. We know today we have missiles that can break up into separate missiles. If you have basically a missile the size as a capital ship that breaks into missiles the size of a torpedo. How many missiles do you think will be coming in towards a Minbari world? Few hundred? Maybe a thousand? Maybe more? There's no way the majority of those missiles would be intercepted. The Minbari capital ships are great aimers true. But they would have to do some serious fast and accurate shooting to catch every one of a five thousand missile payload coming in towards their planet and it would only take a few to devastate their urban areas.
3) The Minbari have no creativity in warfare and play strictly by the book.
http://babylon5.wikia.com/wiki/Blackstar They didn't go after Earth originally when they very well could. They have not had a war in a very long time either. They would do what they have been doing since the warrior caste was already set lose and had a holy war declared. Their tactics would not change if their worlds started to burn.
The Minbari are very honorable and by the book when it comes to warfare and that is a weakness I think.
Wrong, this means like everyone else they know where the border is. Read your own statement.
I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you on this one. A world doesn't live with the Minbari and count on their support without knowing where their systems are. Even if not the capital world they would know where their nearest military bases or trade posts are.
Regarding the targeting problem. No, you didn't fix anything. In fact the very people you claim always support you were the ones who shot this idea down before I even had a chance to speak on it. You've yet again failed to prove anything.
Okay just to get this out in the open since you seem too retarded to understand. People with green names are moderators.
Now for the targeting solution. A ship does not have to block out a star in order for the solution to pick them up. Just like a exo-planet does not have to block out a star for us to pick it up. All that is needed is a drop in light coming from said star. But Monroe, you say, stars aren't in every part of the background. This is true but its not your backyard we're talking about. There are many many stars in space and from a fleet's perspective there will be a star behind a Minbari warship in almost every concievable angle. If there isn't a star behind Minbari ship 1 from EA Ship A's perspective then there probably is one from EA ship B or C or D or E or F perspective. Its not perfect no but it should vastly diminish the usefulness of the stealth technology and bring things down to a little more even.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of ... sit_method
You had one kid who knew nothing about the subject supporting you (another person who knew nothing on the subject) and somehow you think that is going to matter to me? You could have ten, twenty or fifty people supporting. I don't care since none of them knew anything about the subject at hand. When it comes to fighting, I trust people who have been involved in it. I have not in the past nor ever in the future have any care of what a bunch of uneducated civis have to say about how combat works. Oh, by the way, on that last argument, you didn't win, you ran away, then you begged some of the mods to make me stop. Don't feel bad, they didn't ignore you, they asked me to or at least asked me to be nicer about it. I laughed at it because you got raped so badly that you had to beg for mercy. Now, you can try to spin this as much as you want. Until you act with honesty I'm going to keep kicking your ass over every topic I catch you bullshitting in.
I recommend you reread (Or find someone to read to you) the thread. Things started out slightly in your favor. I wasn't trying to disprove your method from working. I was defending mine. By the end of the debate you were the only one who thought my plan had no chance of success. While some people perfected yours, all agreed mine would probably work.
So in short yeah I'll back off from the drone carrier plan though I do think it would work with known planet locations. And my targeting solution would even things considerably.