That's pretty awesome.Lazar wrote:Wow... he made a Sovereign in the style of the JJprise.
Best Fan-Ships
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Best Fan-Ships
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Funny thing that the apollo is in the "Worst" thread too.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Anything Dark Omen did.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=630
I wish he'd return to the forums for some more art. Guy was cool too.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=630
I wish he'd return to the forums for some more art. Guy was cool too.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
- Location: Vienna
Re: Best Fan-Ships
To be honest, I do not like this runabout. When it cames to spaceships I am rather objected to this whole streamlined look. (on the other hand I also like cars which are fast as hell and do not look like it )
I just think it is honestly not needed. Most of the time this ships fly in a medium where aerodynamic is not an issue and for planetary flight operation I always imagined the just pop a weak shield and that is that.
Also - altough we never saw it actually - one of the most beutiful things about the runabout is the modular design which seems not to be present in this design.
The runabout looks like a sensible, well thought out flexible design whereas this one looks like a tom paris wet dream .
I just think it is honestly not needed. Most of the time this ships fly in a medium where aerodynamic is not an issue and for planetary flight operation I always imagined the just pop a weak shield and that is that.
Also - altough we never saw it actually - one of the most beutiful things about the runabout is the modular design which seems not to be present in this design.
The runabout looks like a sensible, well thought out flexible design whereas this one looks like a tom paris wet dream .
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Atekimogus wrote: a tom paris wet dream .
Yeah...thanks for that
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Except that a streamlined look in small craft is a definite trend in more "modern" designs.Atekimogus wrote:To be honest, I do not like this runabout. When it cames to spaceships I am rather objected to this whole streamlined look. (on the other hand I also like cars which are fast as hell and do not look like it )
http://www.ditl.org/gptz/GTy11Atmos1.jpg
http://www.ditl.org/gptz/GTy9Shuttle1.jpg
http://www.ditl.org/gpns/GSovyacht2.jpg
The Type 9, Type 11, and Sov Yacht are all very streamlined craft. You could even make the case that the Sovergein herself is more streamlined as was Voyager to a degree. Like it or not "streamlined," is definitely an acceptable design look in Trek. As for popping a shield for atmospheric work, why? If you can just streamline the shape a bit and make it work without a shield why waste the energy on a shield?
I had a significant difference of opinion in the Apollo's case.SomosFuga wrote:Funny thing that the apollo is in the "Worst" thread too.
That's actually his "Perception" class that got JJ-ized.Lazar wrote:Wow... he made a Sovereign in the style of the JJprise.
And to keep the good ships rolling, seriously, someone else must have some fan ships they actually like, the NX-01 the way it should have been.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Its okay I guess, but damn its a bit thin at the back end. Looks to be less than 3 meters.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Best Fan-Ships
That thing is hideous.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Hmm it has polarized armour and force fields...
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Yeah, but then again I'm 95% about the visual look of the ships more so than the stats their maker's give them.
Re: Best Fan-Ships
Yeah I agree,it looks horrible. no offenseTyyr wrote:The TOS-ized NX-01?
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Best Fan-Ships
None taken, though I have to admit to being a bit surprised given that to me it looks much more appropriate as a pre-TOS ship than the upside down Akira we got.
Re: Best Fan-Ships
True, this one is way better than Ent NX01 but still has very similar design ethic.Tyyr wrote:None taken, though I have to admit to being a bit surprised given that to me it looks much more appropriate as a pre-TOS ship than the upside down Akira we got.
Trata las situaciones estresantes como lo haría 1 perro: si no puedes comértelo o jugar con ello, méate encima y lárgate!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
Handle stressful situations as a dog would: if you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and get out of there!!!
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Best Fan-Ships
IDK, it looks like the same design philosophy as the ENT NX, just with TOS-era parts. I'd rather have seen a primitive, vaguely cylindrical NX.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer