Ship doodles: input wanted!
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
Are they stationary or mobile? Are they natural or artificial?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
I was envisioning something constructed by the humans, sort of like B5. My desire is to keep things as hard and as low-energy as I can, even though it's obviously advanced theoretical physics, and in an ultra-hard universe like Orion's Arm it might be something that would take humans millennia to develop. As for traveling to new star systems, it would be either a) large dedicated hyperdrive ships that can travel there and set up the portals, or b) just using sublight ships to set them up, which would set a very strong limitation on where humans could go (i.e. a slowly expanding bubble of accessibility). And then the added possibility of hooking up with networks constructed by other alien races. I've been working on a reptilian race that would serve as benefactors sort of like the Vulcans, and an insectoid race that would be more hostile. (I also have a design for a big, mysterious, super advanced alien ship that I might throw in at some point - basically a Y-shape from the front, extending back hundreds of meters, with a sort of dark purple hull.)
I like the Stargate model as Reliant suggested, but my concern is, do you think the gates should require a constant supply of energy in order to remain open, or would they be more permanent? (Have they provided much explanation of that stuff in Stargate?) I'm trying to envision some big assembly in space with fusion or antimatter reactors attached.
Then there's the issue of where to put them. Earth orbit, or solar orbit at a stable distance from Earth? I'd prefer Earth orbit, but then there's the question of accessibility and vulnerability if you place it right next to your home planet. I suppose if it's a free, open connexion (like DS9's wormhole), that would be more dangerous, but if you can control how ships enter and exit, then it would be safer.
I'd really like to read up on a lot more sci-fi universes to get some ideas.
I like the Stargate model as Reliant suggested, but my concern is, do you think the gates should require a constant supply of energy in order to remain open, or would they be more permanent? (Have they provided much explanation of that stuff in Stargate?) I'm trying to envision some big assembly in space with fusion or antimatter reactors attached.
Then there's the issue of where to put them. Earth orbit, or solar orbit at a stable distance from Earth? I'd prefer Earth orbit, but then there's the question of accessibility and vulnerability if you place it right next to your home planet. I suppose if it's a free, open connexion (like DS9's wormhole), that would be more dangerous, but if you can control how ships enter and exit, then it would be safer.
I'd really like to read up on a lot more sci-fi universes to get some ideas.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
My take would be to have a natural phenomenon that requires a very large amount of energy to open. Originally a high energy deflector pulse (or something similar) would have to be fired to open it, which sapped energy from shields, weapons, communications and sensors. Obviously a negative quality. so a series of large stations were constructed around the natural phenomenon that fires the pulse for you. The "Gate Stations" would also be minimally armed, sorta like Trade Lanes in Freelancer, only they fire you at FTL speeds more like Trade Gates in the same game franchise.
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
I'm concerned about what to do with waste heat on my ships. What do you think of having large radiator panels (presumably of some very strong and efficient material) built into the hull around the ship's fusion reactors?
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
Your best bet would be to use the main engines as radiators - maintaining gravity, heating, etc, would be an insignificant fraction of total output compared with engines or weapons, so use them to get rid of waste heat. If you want station-keeping relative to another object, use fore and aft engines simultaneously.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Ship doodles: input wanted!
You could go with the droplet system they use in Mass Effect, it would at least minimize the need for large, bulky and vulnerable radiators. Remember, the more stuff you put on them to armour them, the less efficient they'll be.
Also, turn off stuff you don't need in combat.
Also, turn off stuff you don't need in combat.