But a starship wouldn't need ballast tanks. So no extra spacing.me,myself and I wrote:Don't at least some subs have the ballast tanks and batteries and such between the two hulls? Added protection and such?Mikey wrote:Yeah, to be effective in increasing structural resistance, they'd have to be next to each other - like the armor hull and pressure hull of a sub.
Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
So they have super thick windows?
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Nope. No super thick super windows.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Oh, so what's your problem with them, ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
- Praeothmin
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Do we have canon data available on those windows?Deepcrush wrote:Nope. No super thick super windows.
They don't seem that thin when we look at them, and evaluating the thickness from inside the ship is tricky at best.
Also, concerning the dome, didn't the Duras sisters target the bridge during their attack on the E-D? (I don't remember, so anyone with the info is welcomed to share it, thanks)
Perhaps the windows were weakened by all the shots hitting the ship before the crash.
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
I don't think the bridge was ever hit. The shots seemed more to hit the engineering hull.
Also, the simple fact that the dome ruptured while the hull around it remained intact is clear proof that the windows are nowhere near as strong as the hull.
Also, the simple fact that the dome ruptured while the hull around it remained intact is clear proof that the windows are nowhere near as strong as the hull.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
But all the force was transfered through the ship to the dome which would mean a lot of force on that glass.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
How was it all transfered to the dome? And how does that refute my point that the hull surrounding the dome was still intact, and not even buckled?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
But they would have other things, IE (like nick said), crew quarters. If we give them the benefit of the doubt, Starfleet would organize most plans so that the battlestations and such, at least for the civilians, were sheltered in the hull (ignore the bridge for a moment, I know it's on top with little or no protection). Perhaps they figure that the quarters and the things in them can be replaced more easily than people and provide another weapons buffer.Deepcrush wrote:But a starship wouldn't need ballast tanks. So no extra spacing.me,myself and I wrote:Don't at least some subs have the ballast tanks and batteries and such between the two hulls? Added protection and such?Mikey wrote:Yeah, to be effective in increasing structural resistance, they'd have to be next to each other - like the armor hull and pressure hull of a sub.
Just before the end of the battle one of the sisters orders "target their bridge!" followed by the report "we are cloaking, our shields are down!." We never find out if the shot was carried out.Praeothmin wrote:Do we have canon data available on those windows?Deepcrush wrote:Nope. No super thick super windows.
They don't seem that thin when we look at them, and evaluating the thickness from inside the ship is tricky at best.
Also, concerning the dome, didn't the Duras sisters target the bridge during their attack on the E-D? (I don't remember, so anyone with the info is welcomed to share it, thanks)
Perhaps the windows were weakened by all the shots hitting the ship before the crash.
Also, it should be noted that as far as we can tell, none of the other windows in the saucer broke, and the saucer handled an impact with a planet better than the E-E with another ship.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Praeothmin
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Agreed, they are weaker, but by how much?Rochey wrote:Also, the simple fact that the dome ruptured while the hull around it remained intact is clear proof that the windows are nowhere near as strong as the hull
We do not know how damaged was the hull.
Did it have microfractures, was it near buckling?
Don't forget that, while the outer hull seemed to have survived nicely, the interior of the ship was a total mess, so the energies involved were great.
We know that the ship was subjected to incredible structural stress.
Also true, a lot of windows seemed intact after the crash, including some on the saucer's edge, showing how resilient they are.Me, Myself and I wrote:Also, it should be noted that as far as we can tell, none of the other windows in the saucer broke, and the saucer handled an impact with a planet better than the E-E with another ship.
And the E-E being greatly damaged by the impact with another ship just goes to show how tough ships in the ST universe are: tougher then planets...
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
No idea. But the fact that the dome was destroyed while the hull itself, at the very worst, stopped just short of exhibiting any major damage says a lot.Agreed, they are weaker, but by how much?
We do not know how damaged was the hull.
Did it have microfractures, was it near buckling?
The fact is, if they're even slightly weaker, they shouldn't be there at all.
Indeed. And the windows, whatever they may be made of, have shown that they're unable to stand up to those types of stresses, while the hull is (if just barely).
Don't forget that, while the outer hull seemed to have survived nicely, the interior of the ship was a total mess, so the energies involved were great.
We know that the ship was subjected to incredible structural stress.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
AHEM:Rochey wrote:Indeed. And the windows, whatever they may be made of, have shown that they're unable to stand up to those types of stresses, while the hull is (if just barely).
Don't forget that, while the outer hull seemed to have survived nicely, the interior of the ship was a total mess, so the energies involved were great.
We know that the ship was subjected to incredible structural stress.
I earlier wrote wrote:Also, it should be noted that as far as we can tell, none of the other windows in the saucer broke, and the saucer handled an impact with a planet better than the E-E with another ship.
We saw a grand total of 1 broken window.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
We saw a grand total of 1 window. We've no idea of the state of the other windows. That the bridge dome (which would logicaly be the most "armoured" of them all") was broken would suggest that the rest, or most of them, were as well.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
What I stated before, about the transfer of energy, when something hits the ground, all the force from the impact gets transferred and exerted on the highest point (E.G. the bridge dome) So it would make sense that since all the impact force was exerted on the dome, that it would break.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Hypothetical Starfleet ship roles
Does that take into account the angle at which it crashed? It didn't just drop straight down; it slammed more or less head-first into the ground.
And, yet again, why didn't the hull surrounding the dome so much as buckle while the whole dome was destroyed?
And, yet again, why didn't the hull surrounding the dome so much as buckle while the whole dome was destroyed?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"