Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

The Next Generation
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Mark »

I don't think they'll continue the Nebula run much longer though. They have numbers enough to keep them fielded. They will need to move beyond it fairly quickly to keep up.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Teaos »

Why? The basic chape and structure is fine, just keep updating systems in new designs.

The design is only 20 years old, which for the Federation, isnt much.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Mark »

I'm speaking in relative terms. Maybe another 5 or 10 year run, before moving on to something else to support all the new techs, like the ablative armor generators, slipstream drive, and so forth.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Mikey »

No reason that we know of that the Neb can't accomodate most of the new tech. In fact, with the seemingly swappable mission pod a/o pod variants, it seems to be one of the more flexible general designs we've seen.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Deepcrush »

Agreed, all the more point that the Nebula class meets the call.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Tsukiyumi »

That's why I went with a quantum torpedo pod for the Ravage in the Daystrom RP. That's a heck of an upgrade.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Deepcrush »

Maybe you should think about upgrading the Saucer phasers too type XII's. Give you a little more kick.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Teaos »

To upgrade phasers you need more power, which is a whole different level of upgrade. Swapping to QT's I imagin wouldnt be to hard at all, switching phasers would take months and a drydock.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Deepcrush »

True, that and most likely added space would be needed. Which is why I thought about the Saucer but figured the rest of the ship may just be to packed. The GCS saucer seemed to have a ton of free space. Though, I doubt it would take months. Maybe a few weeks. Replacing two phaser grids shouldn't be too bad.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Mark »

But could a Nebula power core support type XII phasers with all power routed to maximise tactical and manuvering systems?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by stitch626 »

Maybe not the original cores, but sure with new ones.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Praeothmin
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Praeothmin »

Deepcrush wrote:Maybe a few weeks. Replacing two phaser grids shouldn't be too bad.
I doubt it would be that easy.
You replace the Type X Phasers for Type XII Phasers.
You need new Phaser strips which will resist the increased power output.
You need more powerful power conduits.
You may need to redesign the Phaser circuits for the new equipment, a recalibration of the power output of the entire ship circuit because now more power is going to the weapons then previously, so the new circuits have to be fed differently then the old one, but this must not affect the rest of the ship's power needs, etc...

See, replacing Phasers seems less akin to replacing cannons for bigger cannons, then replacing a laser source in optical equipment by another source.
Low-powered optical sources aren't designed to house high powered lasers, to do so would require a redesign of the optical circuit.
The truth always depends on which side of the fence you're standing... ;)
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Mark »

stitch626 wrote:Maybe not the original cores, but sure with new ones.

Which would massively increase said refit time, because then you'd have to redesign the entire power distribution net as well.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Teaos »

Exactly, your pretty much better off just building a new ship and demoting the older ships to 2nd line ships.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Which ship could become the backbone of the Modern Starfleet

Post by Deepcrush »

They completed a refit over the Lakota in less then a season's time. Improved armor, shields, phasers and TLs. Upgrading two phaser grids on a ship with far more free space that doesn't even have to be taken off patrol since its only two of eleven.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply