What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Probably, it removes a system which reduces complexity and may improve speed/efficency.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Aye, that was my thought on the matter, as well.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
And one that didn't even LOOK that cool visually.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Classes I hate more then the GCS?
The Excelsior refit (Ent-B). What bullshit was that. They built a ship without working PTLs. Lots of extra hull bits but with almost no armor as the Nexus wave cut through the hull yet took something like an hour to destroy a couple of transports. This was basicly the Generations way of spitting on the greatest ship (pound for pound) ever built.
Yeager... Worthless.
Defiant... little uber ship that could. How many times do you think BB jerked himself off to this as the show went on? When she first came on screen she got her ass beat by 3 Bugs. THough it still took 3 of them to do it. That would have been an awsome ship. However, by the end of the series she was taking out a dozen or so Bugs per battle and even attacking full sized battlecruisers without worry. Started well then went to fuck.
Constellation... just crap. They had the Excelsior so why build that hunk of junk.
The Excelsior refit (Ent-B). What bullshit was that. They built a ship without working PTLs. Lots of extra hull bits but with almost no armor as the Nexus wave cut through the hull yet took something like an hour to destroy a couple of transports. This was basicly the Generations way of spitting on the greatest ship (pound for pound) ever built.
Yeager... Worthless.
Defiant... little uber ship that could. How many times do you think BB jerked himself off to this as the show went on? When she first came on screen she got her ass beat by 3 Bugs. THough it still took 3 of them to do it. That would have been an awsome ship. However, by the end of the series she was taking out a dozen or so Bugs per battle and even attacking full sized battlecruisers without worry. Started well then went to fuck.
Constellation... just crap. They had the Excelsior so why build that hunk of junk.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
I have to go along with Deep on that one. They HAD the Excelsior class, and they were still running Miranda class ships. What the hell was the point of the Constellation class?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
I believe an explanation was that the Constellation was designed to test the viability of a quad-nacelle design. It stands to reason that they might well be able to go faster, since Starfleet had never tested them before. They didn't, which is fair and the process of elimination continued. They were a failed experiment. Thats how i took the Constellations too. It also slots neatly into picard saying that the Stargazer was underpowered, as spreading the power of one Warp Core over 4 nacelles would likely mean less power to each nacelle than if it were simply two nacelles.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Yeah, but that's what I mean. That explanation makes sense, but it also makes the Intrepid a fairly pathetic design. "Well we had this idea for better warp drive... but it didn't pan out and we thought of something even better. Oh well."me,myself and I wrote:Personally I always figured that since the Sovereign and other ships don't have the bendy nacelles, starfleet figured out how to get the same effect without the bending. Or just chalk it up to
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
I've read that they added the secondary hull bulge just so there would be something that they could easily blow up in the Nexus scene.Deepcrush wrote:The Excelsior refit (Ent-B). What bullshit was that. They built a ship without working PTLs. Lots of extra hull bits but with almost no armor as the Nexus wave cut through the hull yet took something like an hour to destroy a couple of transports. This was basicly the Generations way of spitting on the greatest ship (pound for pound) ever built.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Well thats the OOU reason which makes a fair bit of sense. That and maybe they wanted to have something new looking.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Bleh........I liked the NX-2000 WAY more than the E-B for sheer appearance. The E-B just didn't have the same...........feel...to it, if that makes any sense.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Eh, Deep, have you taken a close look at the Lakota recently? Not that I'm disagreeing with your points, but I thought you liked that ship.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
Crappy looks can be excused if a ship kicks ass 8)Captain Seafort wrote:Eh, Deep, have you taken a close look at the Lakota recently? Not that I'm disagreeing with your points, but I thought you liked that ship.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13106
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
I liked the COnstellation. I just saw it as another ship design from the movie era. *Shrug*
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
I liked it as well. I always wanted to put a novel on one, one of the underpowered horses that tried to cut it in the Miranda's world but never really made it. It could be quite an interesting setting. And the obvious challenges of trying to coax decent performance out of the supposedly weak powerplant.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: What are ships which are worse than the Galaxy-class?
The Lakota looks the same as any Excelsior class. What I hate is the Ent-B and her pink hull.Captain Seafort wrote:Eh, Deep, have you taken a close look at the Lakota recently? Not that I'm disagreeing with your points, but I thought you liked that ship.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu