Enterprise class Battleship
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Enterprise class Battleship
I think its only fair that the name given to the most illustrious commands of starfleet, the name given to some of the best warships of the British and United states navies of their day, the name that today graces CVN-65 of the US navy gets a damn cool ship to play with in Ariel. Well...I think a battleship is quite fitting for her.
The Enterprise class, the first Battleship to be commissioned into the Republic fleet as a mass produced line of warships, represents the pinnacle of technology in use by the Republic today. The largest warship in the fleet by about 700 meters, the 4.8 km long Enterprise class ships are designed for one purpose: To utterly obliterate all that get in her way. In that vain, her main armament consists of a quartet of double turrets mounting 315 mm Particle "Hammer" cannons, the heaviest guns ever fitted to a warship by some 35 mm. A total of 8 barrels is rated to be strong enough to tear a Antares class defense post into shreds with a single volley. This ship, quite literally outguns everything that the fleet has to offer so far. Her secondary battery consists of 20 twin barrel 130 mm Pulse Plasma cannon turrets, all mounted in 4-turret blisters around the hull. finally, she carries a staggering 40 quad barrel 20mm gattlibng plasma cannons for anti-fighter defenses. Her shields have a maximum rating of 8,000,000 TeraJoules, a capacity that rivals many space stations defenses.The armour, unfortunately, is more in line with the other battleships of the fleet at 45 cm of high-capacity crystalline lattice armour with a 10 cm layer of energy Absorbing materials underneath to dampen any fire that penetrates the armour. Some of the later ships have been modified to carry 2 long range torpedo tubes instead of 2 secondary batteries. These tubes are designed to fit the incredibly expensive, but immensely powerful "Minerva" missiles, for use against planetary bodies. These missiles individually are capable of decimating a continent the size of Asia leaving it utterly lifeless. As such, they are heavily regulated and every ship carries only 10 of the missiles. Usage of them requires activation from the 3 senior officers, and even then they are a controversial weapon. They have never been used in combat situations, and it is very likely they will never be used because of the ethical grey that surrounds them.
The biggest hinderence to the Enterprise class is her administrators. The fleet is reluctant to use them often, one because of the drain on resources it causes in simply fielding them and two because of the firepower they have. They are the obsidian sword of the republic, but that sword is more of a mantle piece display than a weapon. That said, should the need arise to use them they are always ready. Unfortunately, they are quite likely to sit doing little because of problems at home. Only 4 have been delivered the the fleet, the Enterprise, the Endeavour, the Elysium and the Endurance; but they are already recieving many protests from peacekeepers purely because they are purely weapons of war.
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
that's a sweet ship Reliant.
what program to you use to draw them?
what program to you use to draw them?
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
Paint.Net. simple, effective and it can do line smoothing which is my main annoyance with MS Paint.
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
nice.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
The big turret on the upper forward hull... if it turns it will smash into those little turrets underneath it.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
Not with Zap Branigan at the helm.GrahamKennedy wrote:The big turret on the upper forward hull... if it turns it will smash into those little turrets underneath it.
Maybe the big turret sticks out enough to avoid the smaller ones?
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
Aye, the turret is mounted on a small rise from the hull. It is pretty small, admittedly, but it is enough to stop turret collision. Unfortunately, this provides a major fault in that the smaller turrets have their arc limited when the main turret is above them.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
It might be worth replacing at least some of those turrets with fixed forward pointing emplacements. There's at least a few of them that can barely turn anyway, and it would save a bunch of complexity.Reliant121 wrote:Aye, the turret is mounted on a small rise from the hull. It is pretty small, admittedly, but it is enough to stop turret collision. Unfortunately, this provides a major fault in that the smaller turrets have their arc limited when the main turret is above them.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
"Name of the best warships"? What happened to the Ark Royal?
Nice looking ship, but killing everything in Asia through firepower alone? That's quite some punch - getting on for a hundred billion megatons, and more than enough to wipe out all life on a planet, in the longer term.
Nice looking ship, but killing everything in Asia through firepower alone? That's quite some punch - getting on for a hundred billion megatons, and more than enough to wipe out all life on a planet, in the longer term.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
Exactly my point. These things are quite literally "bang bang, you die". Thats why they are so controversial and more of a political debate than a warship really.
And dont worry. being british, and of RN bloodline, i have intention to honour the illustrious ships of the RN in due course
And GK, would it be worth replacing that battery with the Minerva launchers? that'd provide a good in universe reason why they were replaced, the turrets were ineffective?
And dont worry. being british, and of RN bloodline, i have intention to honour the illustrious ships of the RN in due course
And GK, would it be worth replacing that battery with the Minerva launchers? that'd provide a good in universe reason why they were replaced, the turrets were ineffective?
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Enterprise class Battleship
The Revised version, with the Minerva Launchers fitted instead of the upper 'hammerhead section' secondary battery.