Ok, other ships are done, now for the feds...
On the Work Bee specs page:
Impulse only :
Max Impulse Speed : 0.01 x c
Atmospheric Cruise (Mach) : 2
Atmospheric Max (Mach) : 5
I may be wrong, but it would seem that the Work Bee wouldn't even have impulse. All that can been seen are thrusters, and they never move very fast.
Also, in the middle of the third paragraph of the notes section
- a very old material which nevertheless met the strength and and density requirements. Today the bees exist in many variations according to how modern their equipment fit is; a typical work bee of the 2370's
and is repeated (bolded).
Also, later in the same paragraph
a typical work bee of the 2370's will have a small isolinear flight computer, a short range navigational laser radar, and a shell comprised of monotanium laminated with carbon tetride.
yet in the specification table you give it a duranium/tritanium hull.
On the Galaxy specs page:
up to ten at a time42 every six seconds, while t43 As with many recent Federation design
The bolded section is an unfinished sentence.
This is in the second paragraph after the deck plans information.
Also for the 43rd reference:
43 Star Trek The Next Generation Technical Manual Page 1231058
Does the TM really have that many pages?
Also, in the last paragraph before you give the upgraded specs
Though new Galaxy class ships are being produced without any science or diplomatic facilities included in order to reduce the vessel mass and so enhance combat performance during the Dominion war.
This sentence (its green) seems to end abruptly. It starts with "though" but doesn't end in such a way that though would be appropriate.
Also in the unit run section of the advanced specs
Unit Run :
USS Magellan8 - Active
???????
what's with all of the question marks?
On the Galaxy images page:
Although saucer separation was planned to be a relatively
normal part of the life of a Galaxy class, in serivce separation is employed only rarely.
For the second image, the bolded word is spelled wrong.
The next one is a contradiction on two separate pages.
On the type 15 specs you give it two phaser banks but in the type 18 page, you state that the type 15 only had one phaser bank.
For the type 11 shuttle, you give it three phaser banks, yet at least three phaser arrays can be clearly seen on the model.
You also did not mention the tachyon bursts that were launched in Insurrection (though they may not be standard armament).
On the type 9 specs page:
2 x Type IV phaser bank
1 x Type IV phaser bank,
I don't understand why you listed the phasers as 2 type 4 and then 1 type 4.
It may be that you intended the 2 to be phaser arrays instead of banks, as you mention them later in the comments section.
For the type 8 shuttle, you have the standard specs with notes and then at the end have uprated specs (which are nearly identical to the standard except for the strength indices). I am wondering if you intended to have them (the uprated specs) or if it was a copying error or something.
On the type 7 specs page:
Armament : , total output 200 TeraWatts
You left out what the armaments actually are.
Also, in the uprated specs for the type 7 (at the end of the notes), you give it phasers but do not have anything in the beam weapon section of the strength indices.
For the type 6 shuttle, you give it no armaments, yet at least two (forward) phaser banks can b e seen on the model.
Also, while you do list 2 phaser banks as being the armaments for the uprated model, you do not include this in the strength indices.
I'm not sure on this, but I believe in "The Managerie", the type 1 shuttle was referred to as a class F shuttle. Otherwise, you can ignore this one.
This is all for now. If I have repeated any, I apologize.
And Graham/Ian. When you get to these, please let us know what are not nits (there are a few I'm not sure about).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
), but on the entry for the Freedom Class, the diplomatic capability is listed as 7. That's as high as the GCS! Surely, a low-capability ship like that can't have such a high rating... 
