Questiona about Trek-nology
Questiona about Trek-nology
Sorry if this is in the wrong place, but seeing as it pertained to the universe as a whole, I didn't see where I could put it.
As for the questions, I'm not sure if they're ever been answered in the show or somewhere here in the hallowed halls of the Daystrom Institute, but I was curious how ships power themselves after they've ejected the warp core. Is there just a mini warp core somewhere or is it something more conventional (I doubt it's a disel, though).
And also, how do they communicate at speeds faster then the speed of light? Does communication travel at warp speeds or is just one of those things people aren't supposed to ask about lest the men in white coats take them away?
Anyway, these questions popped into my brain and I was curious if they had ever been addressed.
As for the questions, I'm not sure if they're ever been answered in the show or somewhere here in the hallowed halls of the Daystrom Institute, but I was curious how ships power themselves after they've ejected the warp core. Is there just a mini warp core somewhere or is it something more conventional (I doubt it's a disel, though).
And also, how do they communicate at speeds faster then the speed of light? Does communication travel at warp speeds or is just one of those things people aren't supposed to ask about lest the men in white coats take them away?
Anyway, these questions popped into my brain and I was curious if they had ever been addressed.
"We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave..."
- Hunter S. Thompson
- Hunter S. Thompson
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
General tech question, so probably best to put it here.
The impulse engines, and the auxillary generators, are fusion reactors.Abraxas wrote:As for the questions, I'm not sure if they're ever been answered in the show or somewhere here in the hallowed halls of the Daystrom Institute, but I was curious how ships power themselves after they've ejected the warp core. Is there just a mini warp core somewhere or is it something more conventional (I doubt it's a disel, though).
Subspace. Yes it's handwaving, but that's the ready-made answer for anything in Trek that ignores real science.And also, how do they communicate at speeds faster then the speed of light? Does communication travel at warp speeds or is just one of those things people aren't supposed to ask about lest the men in white coats take them away?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Impulse engines are basically big fusion generators, and we've heard several times that their output can be used for ships power.
In ST II when the ship takes hits from Reliant for the first time Kirk asks Scotty what's left. He replies "Just the batteries!" That's said to be enough for "a few shots" from the phasers. Presumably these batteries are something rather more advanced than nicads!
I can't see them going to warp on batteries, but maintaining life support, running lighting, computers, doors, etc, maybe a few hours on low impulse.
In ST II when the ship takes hits from Reliant for the first time Kirk asks Scotty what's left. He replies "Just the batteries!" That's said to be enough for "a few shots" from the phasers. Presumably these batteries are something rather more advanced than nicads!
I can't see them going to warp on batteries, but maintaining life support, running lighting, computers, doors, etc, maybe a few hours on low impulse.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Yeah, in addition to the impulse reactors, I was thinking of Scotty's line about the batteries also. They might even be magnetic storage for energetic plasma rather than the equivalent of our chemical electrical batteries.
Fusion power certainly seems to be scalable to the point at which it could power warp speed, based on Scotty's comment about the Romulan ship in TOS: "Balance of Terror." We've discussed endlessly how absurd it is to interpret it to mean that the Romulan ship didn't have FTL capability, so their "simple impulse power" must have referred to the manner of generation, which was patently enough to get them from Romulus to the far side of the Neutral Zone.
Fusion power certainly seems to be scalable to the point at which it could power warp speed, based on Scotty's comment about the Romulan ship in TOS: "Balance of Terror." We've discussed endlessly how absurd it is to interpret it to mean that the Romulan ship didn't have FTL capability, so their "simple impulse power" must have referred to the manner of generation, which was patently enough to get them from Romulus to the far side of the Neutral Zone.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
There's also the Phoenix to consider. Whilst there's nothing canon about the power system one way or the other, I for one find it hard to believe Cochrane had a matter/antimatter system in there.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
What's up with that auxiliary warp core in the Intrepid class?
Yeah, that had always been my interpretation.GrahamKennedy wrote:There's also the Phoenix to consider. Whilst there's nothing canon about the power system one way or the other, I for one find it hard to believe Cochrane had a matter/antimatter system in there.
Yeah, as Seafort noted, they use subspace communications. They've shown subspace communications relays on the show, and the TNG Technical Manual actually establishes speeds for subspace communications - like Warp 9.9999 or something, much faster than any starship could travel. Still, for the sake of realism, they should still have a bit of a time delay, as opposed to the instantaneous communication that they show.Abraxas wrote:And also, how do they communicate at speeds faster then the speed of light? Does communication travel at warp speeds or is just one of those things people aren't supposed to ask about lest the men in white coats take them away?
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
well, everything I had was already said, but since everyone else keeps reiterating it i might as well.
most power comes from the impulse reactors i thought anyway, so ejecting the warp core just shuts down warp and everything else powered off the WC.
Subspace becons can relay communications. Appareantly though the longer a message travels un-aided though subspace the slower it moves however. so if a ship sends a message w/o any becons it takes much longer than if they go through several becons over several hundred ly.
most power comes from the impulse reactors i thought anyway, so ejecting the warp core just shuts down warp and everything else powered off the WC.
Subspace becons can relay communications. Appareantly though the longer a message travels un-aided though subspace the slower it moves however. so if a ship sends a message w/o any becons it takes much longer than if they go through several becons over several hundred ly.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
While it's been terribly inconsistent, there have been a number of examples of delay in communications travel.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13105
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Comm going at the speed of plot? Unheard of!
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
Really? I've got all these memories of them chatting with admirals on distant starbases with not even the slightest delay.Mikey wrote:While it's been terribly inconsistent, there have been a number of examples of delay in communications travel.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
There have also been cases of messages being sent and Picard having to wait hours or days before he got a response. The best way to reconcile them is probably the subspace relay network. In areas well-supplied with relays the message gets pinged along fairly quickly. In sparsely-equipped areas it loses power, the signal slows, and it therefore takes much longer for the signal to propagate.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
I did say the depiction was inconsistent. There were examples, as Seafort supported, but there were also the examples of instantaneous comm that you mention.Lazar wrote:Really? I've got all these memories of them chatting with admirals on distant starbases with not even the slightest delay.Mikey wrote:While it's been terribly inconsistent, there have been a number of examples of delay in communications travel.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
that fits with what I was saying about the becons.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
If you assume that relays can send signals at close to infinite speed, whilst shipboard communicators are quite slow, then the transmission delay doesn't really have anything to do with how far you are from the other end. It's only a function of how far each end is from the nearest relay.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Questiona about Trek-nology
... and Bob's your uncle.
Isn't that what you people say?
Isn't that what you people say?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer