Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
I've seen one similar to that floating around the internet, "You can run, but you'll just die tired".
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Doesn't the Sovereign class pretty much destroy that argument?Rochey wrote:The Connie isn't that pleasant from an aesthetic point of view, but that's how it should be. Form follows function. The Connie was designed to be practical.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
The Sov is a nice blend of form and function. It has a good design, while still keeping a nice sleek form.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13106
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Is there such a thing as too many COnnie pics?Rochey wrote:Don't you already have a large repository of Connie pics?I just googled "Constitution class".
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Sovvy is gorgeous to be sure, but it disappoints me in a couple of ways, though.
For one, it's too small. I know, there's no rule saying Enterprises have to get bigger every time. But dammit, they should! Every Enterprise should be bigger, faster, more powerful, and just all around more kick ass than the last one. The Sov should have been scaled to have 30-50% more volume than the E-D, in my humble opinion.
For another, some aspects of the design nag at me. The quantum torpedo launcher has to be really small to fit where it is... and in fact most of the torpedo tubes have to be really small, especially on the refitted version where they have stuck all sorts of extras on. Small torp tubes bother me, because if they take up so little internal volume then why not fit dozens, even hundreds? I tend to like weapons that are sized in proportion to the ship.
Confusion about separation capability. It's said that the ship was designed with separation as a possibility... but there's only two impulse engines, so apparently the separated ship would have warp only on the engineering hull, and impulse only on the saucer. I don't like that.
For one, it's too small. I know, there's no rule saying Enterprises have to get bigger every time. But dammit, they should! Every Enterprise should be bigger, faster, more powerful, and just all around more kick ass than the last one. The Sov should have been scaled to have 30-50% more volume than the E-D, in my humble opinion.
For another, some aspects of the design nag at me. The quantum torpedo launcher has to be really small to fit where it is... and in fact most of the torpedo tubes have to be really small, especially on the refitted version where they have stuck all sorts of extras on. Small torp tubes bother me, because if they take up so little internal volume then why not fit dozens, even hundreds? I tend to like weapons that are sized in proportion to the ship.
Confusion about separation capability. It's said that the ship was designed with separation as a possibility... but there's only two impulse engines, so apparently the separated ship would have warp only on the engineering hull, and impulse only on the saucer. I don't like that.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
The Sov can seperate? Since when?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
It's unclear. Apparently the guy who designed it did so with a separation capability "in mind" in case they ever wanted to do it. But there's nothing in the movies to indicate that it is possible.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Indeed he did, according to this article.GrahamKennedy wrote:It's unclear. Apparently the guy who designed it did so with a separation capability "in mind" in case they ever wanted to do it. But there's nothing in the movies to indicate that it is possible.
I think Paramount should just indicate somehow that most Federation starships (exceptions possibly being the Nebula, Miranda, and NX, and a few others).
It would make sense that the ships with an obvious primary/secondary structural configuration should be able to separate (i.e., those ships with the primary hull as the 'saucer module'; Connie, Excelsior, Galaxy, Sov).
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Well the original Connie could separate, the problem would come when they wanted to reconnect.
As for the Sov, that bothers me. Imagine how weird the engineering hull would look.
As for the Sov, that bothers me. Imagine how weird the engineering hull would look.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Like an ice cream scoop with nacelles, I imagine.stitch626 wrote:...Imagine how weird the engineering hull would look.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Yummy. Though probly taste gross.
Hmmm, antimatter ice cream...
Hmmm, antimatter ice cream...
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
For the record, I don't know WHY I'm a fan of saucer seperation or MVAM, but damnit, I am. I LOVE seeing a ship break apart and do these awesome things. But what I can't stand is when you seperate the ship and it become WEAKER than if you kept it connected. What the hell is the point of that? If a saucer seperated and was able to function completely seperately (even for a limited time) it would open up all sorts of new possiblites in several different dimensions.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
No need to imagine:stitch626 wrote:Well the original Connie could separate, the problem would come when they wanted to reconnect.
As for the Sov, that bothers me. Imagine how weird the engineering hull would look.
EDIT: OK, that should do it. Not sure how to use flickr though, maybe there's a better way to link it?
Lovely IMO.
Last edited by LaughingCheese on Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:57 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Interesting sign.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- LaughingCheese
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am
Re: Why does everyone love the original TOS Enterprise so much?
Sign? What do you mean?Mark wrote:Interesting sign.
EDIT: OH, I see. Hmm...
THERE! Finally.