Cardassian Ship Technology
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Agreed. Building a bigger ship isn't a simple matter of scaling the designs up.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Somebody forgot to tell the Klingons...Rochey wrote:Agreed. Building a bigger ship isn't a simple matter of scaling the designs up.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Its possible they only kept the outward appearance and redid the interior...
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
That's the most logical explaination.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
I think that a battleship would be neat to see from the CU, but its not a very likely thing to happen. Their shipyards are based on producing Galors and Keldons. These ships are by DS9 standards nothing more then light cruisers. Even if they upgraded them a little more or built them a little larger... Galors are around 300, Keldons 500 in DITL's combat rating. The best the CU could hope for its to turn out a fleet of medium cruisers in the 600 to 800 combat rating range.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
And how useful would these GCS= ships be against the UFP's numbers of Akira's, Uprated Nebs, Uprated GCS, Sovs and Prommies? If your figure of 14 ships per year is right then the CU would be fielding about 1 ship for every 8 UFP ships. That would just lead them to being ever more out numbered then they are now.Rochey wrote:I'm not too sure what you're asking here. You ask could they build such a ship "if they had the means". However, if we assume they have the means then obviously they could build such a vessel.If they had the means, coudl they develope a ship as powerful as the Galaxy-class, Vorcha-class, D'drieniex-class?
I think you mean "do they have the means?" In which case, I'd say yes. The choose not to due to their style of combat revolving more around large numbers of small, cheap, mass producable vessels that can outnumber their oponents.
Presumably a scaled-up version of a Galor, I'd assume.? If so, what would it look like
This is going to be difficult to figure out, though not impossible.and how many could be produced?
First, let's assume the Cardies are going to cut the numbers of Galors and Keldons in production by half, and use those resources to build thier new battleship.
Now, the DS9 TM (non canon, I know, but let's roll with it) says the Cardies produce "63 Galor class battlecruisers [and] 15 Galor class warships" per year.
Presumably, the battlecruiser is the standard Galor listed on DITL and the warship variant is the Keldon, which GK points out is just a modified Galor.
Okay, so we have numbers. Now we need to find out how much tonnage that is.
Going from DITL's estimates, Galors mass 1,687,000 metric tons while Keldons mass 2,230,000 tons.
1,687,000 X 63 = 106,281,000 tons
2,230,000 X 15 = 33,450,000 tons
Total tonnage per year = 139,731,000
Now, if we assume that the Cardies use half that tonnage to create their new battleships, that gives us 69,865,500 metric tons. Now let's assume the Cardies' new battleship is going to have roughly the same mass as the GCS.
GCS mass = 4,960,000
69,865,500 / 4,960,000 = 14 (rounding the ridiculously small decimals down).
Therefore, by sacraficing half of their Keldon and Galor production, the Cardies could build 14 battleships annualy.
Cardie ships are usualy built for long life, so let's assume that the ship's expected hull life is 30 years (lower than DITL's estimate for either the Keldon or the Galor to reflect the difficulty in maintaining such a ship).
30 X 14 = 420
Ergo, by sacraficing half their production capacity of Galors and Keldons, the Cardies could maintain a fleet of 420 battleships.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
There are powers out there who arent the Federation. These battleships could come in very handy against the RSE and Klingons.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Where did I say that doing so would swing the ballance of power, or even be a good idea?And how useful would these GCS= ships be against the UFP's numbers of Akira's, Uprated Nebs, Uprated GCS, Sovs and Prommies? If your figure of 14 ships per year is right then the CU would be fielding about 1 ship for every 8 UFP ships. That would just lead them to being ever more out numbered then they are now.
Someone asked how many GCS equivelants they could make, and I had a go at figuring that out.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
The question shouldn't be whether they'd be a match for the higher-rated ships in the UFP; rather, it should be whether the GCS-equivalents would be better than what they currently had.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
I was asking about how useful these would be...Rochey wrote:Where did I say that doing so would swing the ballance of power, or even be a good idea?And how useful would these GCS= ships be against the UFP's numbers of Akira's, Uprated Nebs, Uprated GCS, Sovs and Prommies? If your figure of 14 ships per year is right then the CU would be fielding about 1 ship for every 8 UFP ships. That would just lead them to being ever more out numbered then they are now.
Someone asked how many GCS equivelants they could make, and I had a go at figuring that out.
Silly Rochey.
Last edited by Deepcrush on Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
In the post DW I would say no. I doubt the DW will be in any shape to produce such an expensive class.Mikey wrote:The question shouldn't be whether they'd be a match for the higher-rated ships in the UFP; rather, it should be whether the GCS-equivalents would be better than what they currently had.
In the pre DW I would say yes. Given a number of years to build them, they could have come in handy when the KDF attacked. Those Vor'cha class Heavy Cruisers wouldn't have had such a great advantage over the Galors and Keldons.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Agreed. All I'm saying is that even if they didn't match up to the mainstays of the Klingons or UFP, anything better than the Galor would have been worth fielding.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
Wouldn't it be interesting to see what a Cardassian shipbuilding ethos would do with Federation tech/resources?
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
This all presupposes that the Cardies are capable of building ships that big. The overriding trend in Trek has been one of bigger = better, and yet even with a very strong design the Galors were pretty small ships by Alpha Quadrant standards. If their materials science were capable of building bigger ships, even in relatively small numbers, you'd have thought they'd have done so.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Cardassian Ship Technology
It would kick a**, that's what. Cardie designs seem to be inherently hardy, no-nonsense, and easily maintainable - add to that the tech advantage and ability to build more powerful/larger vessels...Captain Picard's Hair wrote:Wouldn't it be interesting to see what a Cardassian shipbuilding ethos would do with Federation tech/resources?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer