Pictures from the new TOS movie
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Do NOT jinx us
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Let's just hope this movie goes well with the minimum of continuity errors.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Another Nero pick, this time looking less like Shinzon:
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Well it was colorful. I might bring it back.Mark wrote:BTW........I kind of liked your other avatar, Lazar 8)
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Why must bad guys all ways look like bad guys. Khan didnt look evil.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Still looks like he drinks blood though.Rochey wrote:Another Nero pick, this time looking less like Shinzon:
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Because modern film makers assume their audience is retarded, and need everything spelled out to them.Why must bad guys all ways look like bad guys. Khan didnt look evil.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
What the HELL have they done to the Kelvin? That dish thing on the top? Just what in gods name are they doing?
other than that, no complaints. Zachary Quinto looks to be doing good though.
other than that, no complaints. Zachary Quinto looks to be doing good though.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Its amazing, but the one part of the NX design they got right was the metallic dish then they go and play russian roullete with a semi-automatic pistol and a full clip. The Connie had a metalic dish in TOS yet here we have LOTR in Space... and people honestly expect this movie to not be pure crap...
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
If the Deflector is on top, I presume the red thing we get a glimpse of on the underside is a single nacelle? What a freaking weird looking ship. The bridge does look different indeed.Reliant121 wrote:What the HELL have they done to the Kelvin? That dish thing on the top? Just what in gods name are they doing?
other than that, no complaints. Zachary Quinto looks to be doing good though.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Plus, as Kuvah notes, the Cyclops's ..., er, Kelvin's "modern" looking deflector is out of place on a ship which is otherwise not as streamlined as the more modern ships and appears to have at least a somewhat older looking nacelle (never mind that it's just too damn old to have such a thing as that deflector), never mind the odd eye-on-a-stalk look.
Last edited by Captain Picard's Hair on Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
If that is the case, i think i might have lost faith completely. The film optimist has lost faith. huh, they are doomed.Captain Picard's Hair wrote:If the Deflector is on top, I presume the red thing we get a glimpse of on the underside is a single nacelle? What a freaking weird looking ship. The bridge does look different indeed.Reliant121 wrote:What the HELL have they done to the Kelvin? That dish thing on the top? Just what in gods name are they doing?
other than that, no complaints. Zachary Quinto looks to be doing good though.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
The Entertainment Weekly article.
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20233502,00.html
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20233502,00.html
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Stan - South Park
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
The ship was attacked by the Romans (they have gone beyong being based on the Romans to using their names pretty blatantly) before Kirk's Time. I mean its like Paramount had a meeting and someone asked the question "What didn't we fuck up in Enterprise?" and they realized that they had actually managed, through a freak bit of luck no doubt, to not have messed up the Deflector, from there I'm sure people wanted to install a Sovereign Deflector or other such crap... I bet in the next article the Kelvan has MVAM so it can be a true Uber-CruiserCaptain Picard's Hair wrote:Plus, as Kuvah notes, the Cyclops's ..., er, Kelvin's "modern" looking deflector is out of place on a ship which is otherwise not as streamlined as the more modern ships and appears to have at least a somewhat older looking nacelle (never mind that it's just too damn old to have such a thing as that deflector), never mind the odd eye-on-a-stalk look.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-Elie Wiesel
Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Pictures from the new TOS movie
Legionaries, make ready Gladia and hold fast to Scuta! Load Ballista! Prepare to engage the barbarian armies of Kirkus!KuvahMagh wrote:The ship was attacked by the Romans (they have gone beyong being based on the Romans to using their names pretty blatantly) before Kirk's Time. I mean its like Paramount had a meeting and someone asked the question "What didn't we f**k up in Enterprise?" and they realized that they had actually managed, through a freak bit of luck no doubt, to not have messed up the Deflector, from there I'm sure people wanted to install a Sovereign Deflector or other such crap... I bet in the next article the Kelvan has MVAM so it can be a true Uber-CruiserCaptain Picard's Hair wrote:Plus, as Kuvah notes, the Cyclops's ..., er, Kelvin's "modern" looking deflector is out of place on a ship which is otherwise not as streamlined as the more modern ships and appears to have at least a somewhat older looking nacelle (never mind that it's just too damn old to have such a thing as that deflector), never mind the odd eye-on-a-stalk look.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who