Search found 23 matches
- Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:40 pm
- Forum: TNG
- Topic: What would the "Warp Formula" look like if...
- Replies: 68
- Views: 1578
Re: What would the "Warp Formula" look like if...
Ok, Threshold is the episode that establishes, quite ridiculously, the "Warp 10 Barrier" as an impenetrable limit, except that, Tom Paris figures out how to beat it. Because of this, Graham theorized that speeds above warp 10 were possible (due to All Good Things hitting Warp 13); just tha...
- Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:58 am
- Forum: TNG
- Topic: What would the "Warp Formula" look like if...
- Replies: 68
- Views: 1578
What would the "Warp Formula" look like if...
Graham, If one is to ignore my own personal least favorite episode, Threshold, how do you think it would that change the Warp Formula for determining just how fast one is going for a given warp factor? Personally, I don't see any change to it, but then, I didn't come up with it, so I may just be wro...
- Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:14 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Another spelling error located:
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2763
- Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:54 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Sci-tech idea
- Replies: 35
- Views: 3788
True. I raerly get involved in these technobabble debates but Oh well, here we go. The Plates would likely be constructed of some easily chargable material. They charge it with...uh something...and polarize the energy flow. The polarity absorbs the energy of weapons fire or something... I dunno. Th...
- Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:48 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Another spelling error located:
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2763
Another spelling error located:
I just realized, after looking through the library for several years, that every single entry has a spelling mistake in the Maneuverability. In every entry it is spelled Manoeuvrability. The correct spelling is maneuverability. This is of course located in the Strength Indicies, under combat maneuve...
- Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:16 am
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
- Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:06 am
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
You claim that the Sydney is merely a transport, not a Starship. (don't use Warship, as the Federation doesn't build warships, with the exception of the Defiant class, and they don't even acknowledge that it's a warship.) I have said that the Sydney is a Starfleet Starship. I have provided my evide...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:03 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:00 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
As stated in a previous message, I do not believe that this is the case in the Federation, as they don't even blink when a civilian is armed with a hand phaser or disruptor. Have we actualy seen any citizens with hand held weapons? The only incident that comes to my memory, is a story O'Brien told ...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:50 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
Somethings I didn't see adressed, so I thought I'd jump in. Even if a Freighter is civilian owned and operated, which the classes in the list aren't, it would be up to the owners and operators if they wanted weapons or not. I just can't see how they would turn weapons down unless they were pacifist...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:30 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
And I don't know which freighter's you're talking about, because the one's that I've referenced SPECIFICALLY, The Shelley and The Sydney, were both very clearly Starfleet, therefor MILITARY (sorta). As I have said before, the only one of the three completly unarmed classes that we haven't seen an o...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:37 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
Follow the thread Cap'n... ME: Also, Even the Medical personel in the US Military, who enter combat, corpsmen and the like, are just as fully armed as their combat-monkey bretheren. Now, this doesn't have a dirrect bearing on Starfleet, but the reasons behind it remain the same. Mikey: Not really. M...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:03 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
The reasoning behind who's armed and who isn't depends on the purpose of the ships involved. The shuttles are warships - small warships, but warships nonetheless. Merchant ships aren't. It's the difference between a ridgid raider and a cross-channel ferry. The former is military and therefore has c...
- Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:39 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076
Also, Even the Medical personel in the US Military, who enter combat, corpsmen and the like, are just as fully armed as their combat-monkey bretheren. Not really. Most field medical personnel will be armed as officers - pistol rahter than longarm, no grenades, and probably no k-bar. As far as the s...
- Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:37 pm
- Forum: DITL
- Topic: Why are ships listed as Unarmed?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5076